IRVINE, Calif.Noted San Francisco architect Richard Gage told the audience at Freedom Law Schools annual health and freedom conference recently that his organization, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, is growing quickly and now has more than 600 structural experts who have grave doubts about the official story of what happened to the three World Trade Center buildings that were destroyed in New York City on Sept. 11, 2001.
ARTICLE CONTINUES AFTER VIDEO
AFP INTERVIEWS RICHARD GAGE OF ARCHITECTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH
We hope to have 1,000 members by September and have over 600 now, said Gage, a successful architect whose projects dot the California landscape.
The audience heard Gage describe the many problems with the official version, not the least of which is that fire is an organic process that could not have caused the symmetrical (uniform) destruction of the 110-story TwinTowers that morning, and the fall of the 47-story SolomanBrothersBuilding (Building 7) more than six hours later. These three buildings were part of the Rockefeller-inspired WTC complex, consisting of seven buildings on 16 acres.
Gage noted that the vaunted National Institute for Safety and Technology (NIST) study of the WTC buildings did not even look at the voluminous evidence of a controlled demolition of the three structures on 9-11, so its not as if the evidence was examined by NIST and declared inconclusive. NIST instead only examined the event up to the point of collapse and went no further. Thus, there is no way the government can objectively assess the entire catastrophic event.
How can you find what you are not looking for? Gage asked, adding that various forces that can destroy buildingsincluding fire and earthquakeshave obvious characteristics. Fire does not devour a structure uniformly because it randomly branches out wherever there is, say, furniture and other fuel to consume. The melting point of structural steel is around 2,300 degrees Fahrenheit. The short-duration TwinTower fires reached no more than 1,400 degrees (and that is very generous).
So for the government to say that burning jet fuel within the Twin Towers not only uniformly melted structural steel to the point of collapsebut brought the huge buildings down at near freefall speedis the height of absurdity, not to mention that it is categorically impossible for fire to pulverize concrete. More than 90,000 tons of concrete was pulverized mid-air, along with metal decking. Blast waves blew out windows in buildings 400 feet away.
That third building that many Americans still are only dimly aware of, Building 7, really drives this issue home, in Gages view. Well, the 600 architects I represent are most concerned about the freefall collapse of Building 7, the third skyscraper [that was] not hit by an airplane to fall on the afternoon of 9/11. This is a 47-story skyscraper that in the first hundred feet of its fall is falling at freefall speed. This is acknowledged by NIST. That cant happen unless the structure [underneath] is removed. There is no resistance from the structure to that fall in the first 2.25 seconds. So this of great concern. Of course it falls symmetrically almost at freefall speed and collapses thereafterthe whole building is destroyed in 6.5 seconds, as he told AFP in an exclusive interview.
He added: NIST . . . claims that we have 10 fires [in Building 7], one of which was roaring . . . and [the fires] expanded the beams, knocking a girder off its seat and causing an internal cascading collapsewhich is ludicrous because we would have seen all kinds of deformation on the perimeter structure. Anyway, they claim fires brought this building down, but fire is an organic process that doesnt bring buildings down symmetrically at freefall speed, in the manner of a classic controlled demolition. So thats the No. 1 key point of evidence.
As for the TwinTowers, he said there are many similar features of controlled demolition, but very different as well. Its explosive. Everything is being ejected outside of the footprint 95 percent of the debris. Four-ton perimeter wall units are being hurled laterally 600 feet, which takes 55 miles per hour instant acceleration out of the sides of the tower. Now underneath all three buildings we have several tons of molten metal [at 2,700 F or hotter, which stayed hot for 3-4 months] which is not created by jet fuel or office fires or anything else. Where does all this come from? We have video evidence, photographic evidence. The official government reports dont even talk about it; nor do they talk about the dozens of explosions heard by 118 witnesses recorded orally by the chief fire commissioner of the City of New York.
Gage continued: Its extraordinary what we dont have in the [NIST] report, and thats what we focus on in Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. In addition in the towers we have 110 floors of four-inch thick concrete; they are an acre in size each. Were looking for some of those floors at the bottom of the pile. The photographs dont reveal any of themjust a pile of debris two or three stories high.
Where did the pancakes go? AFP then asked Gage, referring to the governments pancake theory, wherein the heavy collapsing floors from the top overwhelmed the structure below and pancaked down to the bottom. Counting both towers, 220 floors were missing on that Black Tuesday.
Thats what were looking for is pancakes, he replied. Weve got the syrup, we have no pancakes. The syrup is the molten metal.
He went on to say: Also we are looking at explosions that occurred 20, 40 and 60 stories downbelow the collapsing building! Where are they coming from? NIST says they are puffs of air because there are piledrivers pushing down the building and that air has to come out somewhere, right? They are not puffs of air; they are pulverized building materials and they occur at 160 to 200 feet per second. These are propelled by explosive speeds.
As determined by former Brigham Young physicist Steven Jonesand reiterated by Gagethe telltale signs of an ultra-hot incendiary known as thermite (which becomes thermate with sulfur added) were found in the dust at 4-5 distinct locations in New York. Thermite can reach temperatures of 4,500 F and can be explosive when its souped up. Microspheres formed from molten iron constitute some of the evidence, as well as red chips comprised of unignited thermite. Gage believes that nano-thermite is the most likely culprit, since it is a quieter but ultra-powerful explosive.
Al Qaeda probably did not have access to these buildings or to thermite (or thermate), which was not made in a cave in Afghanistan, Gage commented, adding, however, that his organization [www.AE911truth.org] does not formally probe who the perpetrators were. But he fears whoever pulled it off could do it again because the truth has long been suppressed, leaving Americans vulnerable.
Gages group supports a new, genuine investigation, whereas the official investigation did not even include establishing a crime scene at the WTC complex and ended with the official 9/11 Commission report that does even mention Building 7.
Mark Anderson is corresponding editor for American Free Press.
Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute - as long as full credit is given to American Free Press - 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003
